Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Book Review: A Feast for Crows by George R. R. Martin

In the fourth installment of his A Song of Ice and Fire series, George R. R. Martin veers from his juggernaut of a fantastic story, slowing down to pick up the pieces left over from A Storm of Swords. Here, with only a select cast of his trademark and ever-expanding (and sometimes murderously contracting) pageant of rich point-of-view characters, Martin crafts a novel-length transition piece. While it disappoints in comparison to the previous three outstanding novels, which are among the finest, most entertaining fantasy novels written in decades, the novel maintains Martin’s excellent writing, captivating characters, and fascinating situations. The book offers some insight on how A Song of Ice and Fire can capture the crown of the best fantasy epic of the modern day.

While most fans know the history of A Feast for Crows’ publication and the long wait for fifth book, A Dance With Dragons, here’s a quick summary. In 2005, Martin published A Feast for Crows with a note indicating that it was only part of text meant to be a huge fourth novel. So, he split the text in two, placing some of his point-of-view characters in this book, and the remainder in a fifth book. Fans have spent years since in sometimes impatient furor demanding the “other half” of the tome (it arrives this summer, July 12, 2011), replete with fan favorite (mine included) characters Tyrion and Jon Snow, among others.

This split structure reveals itself in the novel’s story. Unlike the previous novels, here the multi-character story is flatter, the build up less climactic and epic. A Feast for Crows opens with Westeros a ruin in the thralls of war. The landscape is apocalyptic. Winter is coming. The lands are muddy wastes, decorated with hanged soldiers. Packs of wolves and outlaws haunt the land, and the common folk suffer terribly.

That theme is more present than ever. Martin’s previous books squeezed tension between the nobles of the game of thrones and the commoners. Here, we see devastation, dismemberment, horrible cruelty, rape, torture and worse inflicted on those poor bastards not lucky enough to be born in a noble house. And, yet, every single point-of-view character has some kind of noble lineage or direct link to high nobility. True, some – like Arya – are thrust into commoner roles, seeing through their own eyes the sometimes ugly, sometimes profound, and nearly always suffering lot of commoners. Martin manages to draw out our egalitarian sense of pity for these folk, while still stoking our root-for-the-underdog sense of heroism for the noble-born good guys – like Brienne or Samwell Tarly (notably, both “slum it” with hapless commoner companions).

At the center of the book are those lascivious, leonine Lannister twins, Cersei and Jaime. Both feature prominently in the book, particularly Cersei, whose chapters outnumber those of all other point-of-view characters in the book. She serves ably, maddeningly as antagonist.

The focus on those twins, who spend the half the novel in the same locale, dampen Martin’s ability to reveal a fantastically realized world in Westeros and the lands across the sea. While their events ultimately prove interesting, the build is slow. What’s more compelling is Martin’s strength as a character transformer. He’s at his best showing detail by detail how Cersei spirals out of control and Jaime distancing himself from her and gaining back some of his own self.

Through them, we see key events, like the siege of Dragonstone, but Martin reveals these from afar, after-the-fact. Unlike, say, the battle at King’s Landing or the Red Wedding in previous books, we don’t even a point-of-view character present for their own part in the action. The “off-stage” effect feels less powerful than those tense scenes of pinpoint action in previous books that Martin then follows with subsequent chapters and perspective. The mix is genius drama in A Storm of Swords. Here, it’s quieter.

Tales of the Viking-like Iron Men, who finally unite and throw their own hat in the ring for the game of thrones by invading the mainland, seem to dwindle as the book progresses. Point-of-view chapters from varying Greyjoy family members wander and ultimately fizzle, leaving this reader uncertain why Martin bothered. It seems as though he’s experimenting, then gives up the game there.

The star of the book is Brienne, the ugly lady warrior knight. In her search for Sansa Stark, she faces the toughest struggles and the book’s only real, exciting action. With a motley crew of unwanted companions wandering the apocalyptic landscape, she’s heroic, driven, and at her best when Martin whispers, and sometimes reveals her vulnerabilities. In Brienne, fans of the series find a noble hero worth cheering for opposite the cynical villainy of Cersei and her cohorts.

The beloved Starks aren’t wholly absent. Sansa and Arya prolong their separate lives as refugees with hidden identities. Their chapters, also, are too flat, feeling more of the same from their chapters in previous books. And, we get a glimpse of Jon Snow through Samwell Tarly, who then ventures out on his own for a wandering, slightly confused trek to the south.

All told, the chapters do indeed build to a compelling ending, though some are whopping cliff hangers. Martin’s writing is solid, though I will say his affectation of describing clothing and medieval foodstuffs reveals one hell of a Renaissance faire complex! That’s my good-natured rubbing, as the novel held up surprisingly well for me given all the flak it received from personal friends and online commentary. It was enough to confirm that Martin will continue writing fantasy I’m thrilled to read.

A Feast for Crows: B+

17 comments:

  1. This series looks like I would like it. I just ordered A Game of Thrones. I love escaping in a good story!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Diane! Enjoy. I love these books. And, you probably already figured out that HBO is starting a new series this spring. I'm eager to check that out whenever I can get it (don't have HBO) -- the trailers look fun.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are on crack with your rating. That was one ponderous book. As I was reading it I was struck with the similarities between the this work and the work of the other "modern master" of fantasy fiction, Robert Jordan. The slow, boring build to nothing recalls where Jordan ran off the rails, leaving a compelling tale to tell you about some other bullshit. In this case, it was the Iron Men among other wasted moments of narrative.

    I suppose I shouldn't be surprised though. A measure of an author I think can be found in his or her ability to write shorter fiction. If you look at Jordan, for example, his Conan work is dismal and boring. Martin's shorter fiction also lacks the vibrant energy to captivate.

    Between the two of them, they epitomize where fantasy fiction went wrong. The focus is on world building. Look over here at this awesome culture I grabbed from Central Asia, and this chapter long description of a castle. It shows I did my research on 14th century German architecture.

    I honestly think JRR screwed us all, purely by accident of course. If he had never written his winding epic of world building, the foundations of modern fantasy fiction might have been Howard, Lamb, and other short fiction writers who knew how to tell a story, not tell us about a story.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've never read Jordan, but nearly everyone I talk to about his work says the same as you. Somehow, I spared myself of that slog. Dumb luck, I guess.

    I think some authors do short work well, some do long, and some are great enough to do both. I'm skeptical that short fiction's always a warning sign for an author's long work. Then again, how the hell else is a fella to figure out how to spend his time!

    As for world building obsessions, I think you're right on there. I've been reading a lot of reviews since last fall or so as I get back into a rhythm of reading and reviewing. And, I'm constantly baffled by fantasy fan reviews that gush about how wonderful the author's worlds are. It's not that I'm opposed to it. It's that I can't figure out why it leads the charge to "great works" of today's fantasy. I see a good number of highly praised works that just aren't especially great narratives. I guess it's that a large part of fantasy readers want something I don't -- some kind of immersive experience, usually large and lengthy, rich and detailed.

    I just don't want a book to "get by" on its strangeness or detail or whatever worldbuilding piece when the characters, the plot, the writing all told just don't hold up. Tolkien, whatever his other flaws, did it well. It's too bad his grand success has such influence over defining quality in fantasy, and others less so.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The effect you are describing is exactly why most fantasy fiction remains in the ghetto of genre fiction. Great fiction and great writers transcend that barrier of the label. You will never find The Road in the fantasy section, but it's subject matter clearly belongs there.

    I still think that great short form writing dictates great long form writing. If you can't captivate me in a few pages, how can you possibly succeed with 1,000 (which is way too much as it is)?

    ReplyDelete
  6. From the Daily Beast -

    "I am very flattered to be called the American Tolkien," said Martin, who, in the flesh, resembles a hippie Santa, and is often seen wearing a newsboy cap and suspenders. "I admire Tolkien vastly… Modern fantasy would not exist if not for him. All of us who follow him are, in a sense, writing in his shadow."

    I want to thank the hippy Santa for illustrating for us all why he sucks.

    ReplyDelete
  7. When we will finally find out about Benjen. Introduced in the 1st book and only mentioned afterwards. Pretty sure he is coldhands but having a what appeared to be a main character in the 1st book and not finding out about him thru the 4th book is ridiculous. I loved the 1st and 2nd, the 3rd was good also but I don't like how characters or situations are introduced and then ignored. This is not suspense, it is just annoying

    ReplyDelete
  8. I love the first book but the succeeding ones - I really did not enjoy them. There are so many characters introduced and totally ignored thereafter. You are left wondering whatever happened to them.

    I thought the series would be comparable to Tolkiens Lord of the Rings. But I am greatly disappointed. I don't like a book that does not incorporate justice into its plot. Martin let's most of the plotters and his villainous characters live on while he kills most of those with a sense of right and wrong. With this book you just are just lead on and on waiting for the climax to see the protagonist triumph over evil only to experience an anti-climactic sense of frustration when they are killed by their friends-turned -enemy.

    I am just so sorry I wasted my time reading these books.

    ReplyDelete
  9. By the time you get to book four in a series you get used to the authors tricks. Long lists of heraldic devices ( The family Gulpps- two fried eggs and a tomato on a white plate). Endless family trees and lists of the names of ships in harbour, 16 types of turtle etc: become boring. I wonder why the author did n't just edit his material down to one book, could it be the publisher could make more dollars with two? More interesting is the authors increasing interest in brutality. Disfigurement comes top of his pleasures, crippling , loss of hand, nose, fingers, followed by scars by the thousand . More disturbing is the gloating pleasure in torture and sadism. Great pity, some of the characters are interesting. Another Tolkien? You must be joking, or part of the publicity campaign

    ReplyDelete
  10. The similarity between Martin and Tolkien is in their realization of a world complete with mythology, politics, and a name for everything. Admittedly, it's not everyone's cup of tea. Some readers simply want to cut to the chase; they don't care what the names of the ships are or what the passing gossip on the local prostitute is. However, for some of us, this is the strength of these books, as it immerses us, makes it all feel tangible and real. As for the violence, Martin has said he was attempting to ground fantasy in the real Middle Ages where indifferent slaughter, incest, etc. were prevalent. Part of what keeps the novels captivating is his fearlessness in dispatching characters. Some books are so safe and predictable, but real life rarely has the convenient encounters where the victim confronts and kills their assailant. The fact that the Hound will never confront his brother, something to which I looked forward, is a disappointment. But then I like to be immersed in the reality of the book, and the fact that good and bad characters die so suddenly and with unresolved journeys is a reflection of reality.
    I've been bouncing back and forth between Dickens and these novels and there's an astounding similarity in their storytelling.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This book is just awful. What a waste of space. This story could have been told in 200 pages.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The first book was the only book worth reading. After the end of the Stark's the series has been inundated with worthless characters doing worthless things. If your life is so bad that you have to be immersed in something as pitiful as The Game of Thrones series then you sir I truly pity.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm all for differing opinions, but let's keep the pity limited to fictional characters. Keep it civil.

    ReplyDelete
  14. No one will ever be happy with what they are given. This is a pretty good series book wise. Like Eric said some people just want to cut to the chase. They want the hero vs. the villian story with the basic, hero wins and everything is fine ending.

    I've seen plenty of reviews give the book 1 star simply because a character died off and they didn't want that to happen and they didn't deserve it. It's easier to write a well constructed novel that is 300 pages or less. I have absolutely no respect for people on here that make fun of the author because they don't like his work. That shows how negative of a human being they are.

    The review Matt gave is honest and forthcoming. He's not blindly praising the book. He's not blindly insulting it either. Yes a feast for crows isn't the best of the series and it's slow paced, but it's a good book in its own right. Every book in the series has its own place. Kikay became dissapointed because there isn't justice in the plot. Yea there is justice, but not very much. This reflects our own very much. He's dissapointed with the books because he wants the good guys to win, and they don't. That's what makes the series interesting. I find most other fantasy books boring because I know the good guy or hero is going to win, so it gives much of the story away.

    There are a lot of characters yes, but the POV characters are the main ones. This series is great because it's not some shitty good vs. evil story where the characters are pre-determined cutouts. The majority of the characters in A Song of Ice and Fire are complex.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Actually I paid for my book.
    After reading the first three in about 6 days I couldn't wait for this one. Plus it has the best title so far... feast for crows... it's gonna be awesome I said.
    Too bad it's not and completely unnecessary for the story I had been reading about in the previous three books.
    Actually, it doesn't really have anything to do with the previous story at all.
    Who are these new lame characters?
    Why do the chapters have lame titles instead of names?
    Why is it so... different?

    People here aren't bashing the book because they want "justice" or the "same old story"... they're bashing it because it sucks compared to the previous books.

    Wow73: "There are a lot of characters yes, but the POV characters are the main ones"

    Wow74: You didn't even read any of these books and yet you somehow have the longest post here. You suck.

    ReplyDelete
  16. [...] Book review- A Feast For Crows- George R R Martin (Riverwords) Share this:ShareEmail This entry was posted in Fantasy, George R R Martin, Sci-Fi/ Fantasy and tagged A Feast for Crows, A Feast for Crows review, A Song of Ice and Fire Book 4, Cersei Lannister, epic fantasy, Epic Fantasy Fiction, Fantasy, George R R Martin, Jaime Lannister, Kings Landing, Westeros by bookblog76. Bookmark the permalink. [...]

    ReplyDelete
  17. Just Finished it..
    As the review says definitely not as epic as the previous books. Any battles are happening well away from the POV characters and any fighting we see is just small skirmishes, and the body count is far less then some of the other books. What this book is, is a great transitional piece, introducing us to new places we had only heard mentioned in previous books, and hinting at the roles they will play in the future events as they unfold. Dorne, The Eyrie, Pyke, Oldtown, all figure more prominently in the plot, and give fans more things to sink their teeth into. And ultimately I felt the Cersei POV chapters alone were enough to make this a worthy read. She is so hilariously demonic in this book, I found myself reading quicker then any of the other books, trying to barrel through to just one more Cersei chapter. This a a solid continuation of a series that's even better as a whole, With characters that evolve in our minds from hated villains into things much more complex and human. And a plot with heroes, villains, but more so, everything inbetween and a plot with infinite shades of grey.

    ReplyDelete